Thought bubble.

Justifies why i turned down USP after getting a place in 2008. “http://studentry.sg/2012/05/29/a-response-to-kent-ridge-commons-cyberbullying-in-nus/” Pointless diatribe. 

The more you try to stir it “pseudo-intellectually”, the more crap comes back to haunt you. 

Kudos to Keira and Choon Hwee for their respective pieces (they actually had a point to make).

I think i get my share of eventful intellectual discourse in Tembusu.

Ah yes, a much needed commentary (http://www.todayonline.com/Voices/EDC120512-0000032/The-manpower-factor-in-our-MRT-problems) on the technical faults of the SMRT and flood debacle has been repackaged by Mr Tan into something utterly illogical (http://tankinlian.blogspot.com/2012/05/restore-role-of-engineers.html).

The piece by Siow Keng Cheng is sensible. But the unnecessary add-on by Tan Kin Lian reeks of intellectual failure. So yes, in this age of cutting-edge research and technology, our former Presidential candidate thinks that the standard of engineering has fallen. Sure.

Once upon a time, Leong Sze Hian had the best, most well-analysed articles floating around cyber space. But that was then and this is now (http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/05/90-of-unemployed-residents-are-singaporeans/).

Sad…really. You’d expect so much more from the lad. Stupidity is the new intelligence isn’t it?

metacog:

One of the biggest problems I had while I was doing Pandamian was that I would read blog posts about startups and take them as The Absolute Truth. So I would tell my co-founders, and teammates: ‘this is The Right Way to do things’, where ‘The Right Way’ was whatever article I had last read.

This…

metacog:

I was stupid enough [1] to vent yesterday on Alvin Wang’s NUS appeal, and stupider to forget that the post could very well go viral, given the attention given to Alvin’s appeal. So this is the last post I’m going to write on the topic. I will summarize everything we know to be true of this saga,…